SANS Assessment of Student Learning Plan (ASLP) Security Awareness Training

Question: 1 / 400

Which method is effective in measuring the impact of security awareness training?

Conducting a single exam at the end of the year

Regular assessments and feedback from participants

Regular assessments and feedback from participants is an effective method for measuring the impact of security awareness training because it allows for continuous monitoring of understanding and retention of the material. This approach fosters an ongoing dialogue between trainers and participants, enabling trainers to identify areas where employees might struggle or require additional information. It also encourages participants to engage with the content, reflect on their learning, and apply the concepts in their daily work.

By using regular assessments, organizations can track improvements over time, tailor training content to address specific gaps in knowledge, and adapt training methods to match the needs of their employees. This dynamic approach promotes a culture of security awareness and ensures that employees remain vigilant in identifying potential threats.

In contrast, conducting a single exam at the end of the year may not accurately reflect long-term retention of information or the practical application of knowledge. Assigning random security topics to employees lacks a structured approach to learning and may not address the specific security challenges faced by an organization. Implementing a standardized test across all departments does not take into account varying levels of understanding and may not provide valuable insights into specific employee concerns or needs.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Assigning random security topics to employees

Implementing a standardized test across all departments

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy